आप किस के साथ? दजजआल या ईमाम मेहदी (अ) के? Prof. Aktarul Wassey या Zaid Hamid ? Gazwa e Hind claims & counter claims – By Ahmed Sohail Siddiqui

आप किस के साथ? दजजआल या ईमाम मेहदी (अ) के? Prof. Akhtarul Wassey या Zaid Hamid ? Gazwa e Hind claims & counter claims – By Ahmed Sohail Siddiqui

आप किस के साथ ? दजजआल या ईमाम मेहदी (अ) के ? Prof.Aktarul Wassey or Zaid Hamid ? Ghazwa e Hind ?

सम्पूर्ण विश्व में धार्मिक और सामाजिक विचारों के आसपास विवाद हमेशा होता रहता है। इसमें धार्मिक और सामाजिक विचारधाराओं के प्रमुख प्रवक्ताओं और विचारकों का योगदान भी शामिल है, जिनमें से कुछ नाम बड़े ही महत्वपूर्ण हैं।

आज हम एक ऐसे मुद्दे पर बातचीत करेंगे जिसमें विश्वासी और अनुयायीगण सामाजिक और धार्मिक दृष्टिकोण से द्विभाजित हैं। इस मुद्दे का नाम है “आप किस के साथ? दज्जाल या ईमाम महदी (अलैहिस्सलाम) के?” और इस मुद्दे पर दो प्रमुख प्रवक्ताओं का नाम है – प्रोफेसर अक्तरुल वासी और ज़ैद हामिद।

प्रोफेसर अक्तरुल वासी एक विद्वान और धार्मिक विचारक हैं जो इस्लामिक विषयों पर अपनी गहरी अध्ययन और शोध के लिए प्रसिद्ध हैं। उनका दृष्टिकोण धर्मिक और सामाजिक सुधार के प्रति है, और वे अपने शिष्यों को सही मार्ग पर चलने के लिए प्रोत्साहित करते हैं। उनका यह धार्मिक दृष्टिकोण लोगों को समाज में अच्छे नागरिक बनाने के लिए प्रेरित करता है।

वहीं, ज़ैद हामिद पाकिस्तान ईसलमिक धर्मिक और सामाजिक विचारक हैं, जो एक अलग दृष्टिकोण रखते हैं। उनका दृष्टिकोण अधिक राष्ट्रवादी और सामाजिक परिवर्तन के प्रति है, और वे अपने समर्थनकर्ताओं को राष्ट्रीय और सांस्कृतिक पहचान के प्रति प्रोत्साहित करते हैं।

इस मुद्दे पर विचार करने के लिए हमें यह ध्यान में रखना चाहिए कि हर व्यक्ति का अपना विचार और धार्मिक दृष्टिकोण होता है, और इसलिए यह आवश्यक है कि हम दूसरों के विचारों का सम्मान करें और उनके साथ सहमत हो या न हो। इसके बावजूद, हमें अपने धार्मिक और सामाजिक दृष्टिकोण को मजबूत बनाने के लिए सभी प्रकार के विचारों का मूल्यांकन करना चाहिए और समृद्धि के प्रति काम करना चाहिए।

इस तरह, विभिन्न धार्मिक और सामाजिक प्रतिस्पर्धाओं के बजाय, हम एक बेहतर समाज और विश्व की.

Dajjal & Imam Mehdi (Peace Be Upon Him): Leaders in Islamic Eschatology


Islamic eschatology, the study of the end times and the signs preceding them, is a topic that has captivated the minds of believers for centuries. Two prominent figures in Islamic eschatology are Dajjal (the Antichrist) and Imam Mehdi (Peace Be Upon Him). While there is a shared interest among scholars and enthusiasts in understanding these figures, it’s crucial to clarify that the leadership of these discussions is not a matter of personal preference but rather a matter of religious knowledge and scholarship. In this article, we will explore the concepts of Dajjal and Imam Mehdi and briefly discuss the roles of prominent Islamic scholars, Prof. Aktarul Wassey and Zaid Hamid, in contributing to the understanding of these eschatological figures.

Dajjal: The False Messiah

Dajjal, often referred to as the Antichrist, is a malevolent figure in Islamic eschatology who is prophesied to emerge in the end times. He is described as a deceiver who will claim to be a messiah and possess miraculous powers. Dajjal’s arrival is considered a major sign of the Day of Judgment. Islamic tradition provides various descriptions of Dajjal’s appearance, his activities, and the trials he will impose upon humanity.

Imam Mehdi (Peace Be Upon Him): The Guided Leader

Imam Mehdi, on the other hand, is a revered figure in Islamic eschatology who is believed to be a guided leader chosen by Allah to lead the Muslim community. His emergence is seen as a source of hope and guidance during times of turmoil. Imam Mehdi is expected to establish justice and righteousness on Earth before the Day of Judgment. While the concept of Imam Mehdi is widely accepted in Islamic tradition, there are differences among scholars regarding the details of his appearance and mission.

Prominent Scholars: Prof. Aktarul Wassey and Zaid Hamid

Prof. Aktarul Wassey is a respected Islamic scholar known for his extensive research and writings on Islamic eschatology. He has contributed to the understanding of Dajjal and Imam Mehdi through his scholarly works and lectures. Prof. Wassey’s approach is grounded in traditional Islamic scholarship and is based on the teachings of the Quran and Hadith (sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad, Peace Be Upon Him).

Zaid Hamid is a well-known commentator and analyst who has also discussed Dajjal and Imam Mehdi in his lectures and writings. However, it’s essential to note that Zaid Hamid’s perspectives may not always align with mainstream Islamic scholarship, and his views are sometimes considered controversial within the Islamic community.

Leadership in Islamic Eschatology

In Islamic eschatology, leadership is determined by religious knowledge, scholarship, and adherence to the Quran and Hadith. While various scholars and commentators may contribute to the understanding of figures like Dajjal and Imam Mehdi, it is the responsibility of the individual believer to seek knowledge from reputable sources and follow established Islamic scholarship.


Dajjal and Imam Mehdi are significant figures in Islamic eschatology, representing the forces of deception and guidance in the end times, respectively. It is crucial for Muslims to approach the study of these figures with a commitment to authentic Islamic sources and scholarship. Prof. Akhtarul Wassey and Zaid Hamid, among others, have contributed to discussions on these eschatological figures, but leadership in this domain should be determined by the credibility of their interpretations and adherence to Islamic teachings.

[23/09, 4:09 pm] Ahmedsohail Siddiqui: Gazwa-e-Hind: A Controversial Debate


Gazwa-e-Hind, an eschatological concept within Islamic tradition, has been a subject of intense debate and speculation among scholars, theologians, and the wider Muslim community. This concept revolves around the notion that a significant military expedition in the Indian subcontinent will occur in the future, signifying a pivotal moment in Islamic history. However, the claim that Gazwa-e-Hind has already transpired, made by Akhtarul Wassey and endorsed by some Islamic scholars, faces significant counterclaims, led by Zaid Hamid and others. In this article, we will explore the claims, counterclaims, and the broader context surrounding Gazwa-e-Hind.

The Claim by Akhtarul Wassey:

Akhtarul Wassey, a respected Islamic scholar, has stirred controversy by suggesting that Gazwa-e-Hind, as prophesied in certain Islamic traditions, has already taken place. He argues that historical events, such as the Islamic conquests and rule in the Indian subcontinent, represent the fulfillment of this prophecy. Wassey posits that the subcontinent’s conversion to Islam, the establishment of Islamic dynasties, and the expansion of Islamic culture throughout its history serve as evidence for this claim. His perspective raises questions about whether Gazwa-e-Hind is a future event or a historical occurrence.

The Counterclaim by Zaid Hamid and Majority Scholars:

On the other side of the debate, Zaid Hamid and a majority of Islamic scholars contend that Gazwa-e-Hind is a future event yet to transpire. They argue that the concept cannot be equated with historical Islamic conquests in the subcontinent. Instead, they interpret Gazwa-e-Hind as a distinct and future military campaign with specific prophetic characteristics. This perspective maintains that the prophecy awaits realization, emphasizing the need for Muslims to prepare spiritually and morally for its occurrence.

The Broader Context:

To understand the Gazwa-e-Hind debate, it’s crucial to recognize its place within Islamic eschatology. Eschatology deals with end-times prophecies and scenarios, and it is a complex and nuanced field in Islamic theology. Some scholars argue that interpreting these prophecies can be subjective, leading to differing opinions within the Muslim community.

It’s also essential to acknowledge that Islamic eschatological beliefs can be influenced by various factors, including cultural and geopolitical contexts. As a result, interpretations may vary among scholars and individuals, contributing to the ongoing Gazwa-e-Hind controversy.


The debate over whether Gazwa-e-Hind has already occurred, as proposed by Akhtarul Wassey, or whether it is a future event, as argued by Zaid Hamid and many scholars, is a contentious issue within Islamic eschatology. While some see historical conquests in the Indian subcontinent as the fulfillment of the prophecy, others emphasize that Gazwa-e-Hind represents a distinct future event.

Ultimately, this debate reflects the richness and diversity of Islamic thought and the challenges of interpreting eschatological prophecies. It is essential for scholars and the Muslim community at large to engage in respectful dialogue and scholarly discourse to better understand and appreciate the various perspectives surrounding Gazwa-e-Hind.

( Ahmed Sohail Siddiqui is the Chief Editor )

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart